What Are You If You’re Not Social?
Taken from Wikipedia:
Humans are social beings. In comparisons with animalia, humans are regarded like the primates for their social qualities. But beyond any other creature, humans are adept at utilizing systems of communication for self-expression, the exchange of ideas, and organization, and as such have created complex social structures composed of many cooperating and competing groups. Human groups range from families to nations. Social interactions between humans have established an extremely wide variety of values, social norms, and rituals, which together form the basis of human society.
This makes me wonder… what about the people who are not adept at utilizing those systems of communication for self-expression? Is this why some people instinctively see special needs people as less than human somehow? Is this why, when a person is unable to use those systems, to communicate or demonstrate self-expression, they are thought to be “in their own world?”
It sounds a little harsh, to think that, if a person isn’t social, that society would view them as “less than human”… but really, this shouldn’t be new to anyone. Aristotle thought this way too.
“Man is by nature a social animal; an individual who is unsocial naturally and not accidentally is either beneath our notice or more than human. Society is something that precedes the individual. Anyone who either cannot lead the common life or is so self-sufficient as not to need to, and therefore does not partake of society, is either a beast or a god. ”
Granted, he included the “more than human” but that’s likely in reference to the savants or prodigies that lock themselves away to work tirelessly on what ever it is that they do.
I mean… a beast or a god? Really?
Personally, I have always questioned: If everyone is different, why would everyone have to have friends?
Think about it. Every single person is different. All seven billion. And yet poets and story tellers continue to tell you that everyone needs someone to love and everyone has to have friends.
Why can’t a person be ok with not having friends? Where did the term “hermit” come from if there aren’t people out there who prefer to be left alone?
Everyone feels lonely sometimes. People that have more friends than they can count can feel lonely sometimes. Is it more likely for a person that has no friends? Sure, but perhaps there’s a reason for that besides the fact that they are alone.
Think about it… why would a person who prefers to be alone be lonely because they are alone? It doesn’t make sense.
In my past, when I had no friends because I was working so hard, I felt very lonely and very depressed. But it wasn’t because I had no friends.
I felt that way because I was conditioned to. Every poem or story I read, every movie I saw, every person I talked to would tell me that I had to have friends…. more so, I had to have love.
Not one person or piece of entertainment told me that it was ok to be alone. In the movies, the hermits would eventually find a family or a place to live and “finally be happy” with others. The others would either eventually commit suicide or “remain alone for the rest of their days”… ugh.
Other than highschool peers, people will tell you to be yourself. That you’re unique. You’re different. There isn’t another person out there like you.
But you have to have friends, like everyone else, because everyone else does… or else you’re “beneath our notice”.
It’s very contradicting and it’s very belittling and it’s very confusing.
Sure, a lot of people without friends do not choose for it to be that way and therefore, have every right to feel lonely and a little down. But some people want to be that way… they eventually find themselves depressed and aren’t sure why.
In either case, don’t listen to Aristotle… don’t listen to the media, entertainment or poets… it’s ok to have no friends. It might be temporary. It might not. Depending on what you want.
But be yourself.
Who knows, you may think you want to be alone only to find that you really don’t… once you are confident enough to be yourself… confidence attracts… friends!
But you are still very much human, friends or not… love or not. Want it, don’t want it… it doesn’t matter, just so long as you are yourself. Friends and love, they’re out there. I won’t think any less of you for wanting them or not wanting them.
You don’t have to have friends to be happy but it certainly helps to be happy if you want to have friends.
So either way… be happy for being you.
Author: Stuart Duncan (275) My name is Stuart Duncan, creator of http://www.stuartduncan.name. My oldest son (6, Cameron) has Autism while my younger son (4, Tyler) does not. I am a work from home web developer with a background in radio. My wife and I do our very best to stay educated and do what ever is necessary to ensure our children have the tools they need to thrive. I share my stories and experiences in an effort to further grow and strengthen the online Autism community and to promote Autism Understanding and Acceptance.
0 thoughts on “What Are You If You’re Not Social?”
We’re on the outside, that’s for sure. I wouldn’t call us subhuman so much as a different breed. I just say that I’m out of time or guilty of anachronism.
I wasn’t social at all until I became brain damaged. I had friends who were never my friends. I get rejected, so I isolate. People then attack me when I’m alone. I believe I was still social though, or I was supposed to be because I created a world of things that were like people. The plug talks to me and stuff like that.
I’m more like a wounded corpse than anything.
Aristotle is kind of right though. People who are not typical often see the system and can rise above it a lot faster. Sociopaths have a huge advantage brain-wise because they are not fooled by conformity. Autistic people can also rise above or they might be slower.
After becoming brain damaged, I noticed that people world build. I also noticed that most of human knowledge is nonsense. It builds off of itself 1+1=2, but it’s really 2+2=5.
Their brains override truth with conformity from authority and stuff. They did an experiment. They had a man point to a tree and say there was a snake when there wasn’t and a good deal of people said they saw the snake.