“Eureka” and Autism

Eureka

I am not sure what the point of one of the latest plot twists on Eureka happened to be, but I found it rather unsettling and quite disturbing. For those of you who don’t know what Eureka is, it is a sci-fi television show on the Syfy Channel. It is about a unique town of brilliant scientists that cause all kinds of mayhem and consternation while they invent new ways of using technology to enhance our daily existence, with the odd military contract thrown in (of course). Oh yeah there is the regulation soap opera overtones and the teenage angst overtones to go along with any modern television program.

What they also happened to have is the requisite autism story line as well. The brilliant head of the corporation along with her brilliant ex-husband who is (was) a scientist in Eureka had an older son who was autistic. Now I say was because the latest plot twist is that six of the character were transported back to 1947 when the town was first formed, and due to their interruption of the space-time-continuum, they changed the present in many ways. One of the ways that everything was changed is that the child is no longer autistic. When it was discussed on the show how that could have happened, there was the pat answer that autism is the outcome of a combination of genes and environment and an untold number of coincidences that come together to create the autism. (I guess we should be lucky that they didn’t say that they had safer vaccines in the new time line).

What I do know is that the show annoyed me to no end. I really hate it when Hollywood decides to pontificate about scientific research and gives simple ignorant answers to questions no one knows the answer to. (No, this is not a diatribe about Jenny McCarthy. Personally I do think that she has done a great deal of harm with her anti-vaccine crusade, but that is not what this post is all about.) What annoyed me is that some writer in his little office somewhere on a Hollywood sound lot has decided to take an issue that is so much a part our lives and give it short shrift as if autism is just another whoopsidaisy.

What would have been more interesting and more informative for those that watch the show is to allow the audience to see just what the family and the autistic child go through in certain circumstances. It would have been great if they showed in that giant brain of Eureka scientists working to find the cause of autism and yes, a cure. It would have been better, if like in Parenthood, the writers showed just how different and outcast so many of our children happen to be and that even in the world of geniuses there are real problems.

But yes, this is a feel good show, not one full of lessons and philosophy, except that a lot of the science that is portrayed on the show is actually real. There is a link on the show website that allows you to learn about the new science that is discussed every week. It really is fascinating what is out there in the scientific domain. You never hear about that. You never hear about the strides and what glorious inventions and future does bode for humankind. But yes, that is part of the show. So why they could not have made the future where they were experimenting with new therapies or ideas to help this child is beyond me.

I did like one scene that involved the mother of the autistic child. The time machine/portal was still in operation and the others were thinking of going back in time and trying to relink to “their” time. The sheriff of the town caught the mother on her way to destroy the machine. She didn’t want to lose her son again she said. You know what, I would have done the same thing if I had been found in that same exact situation. No I would not go back and I would fight damn hard to make sure that my baby didn’t go back either. The reality is that some screwy electrical storm ended up destroying the machine and they stayed in the alternative time line, leaving the autistic child an NT. In some ways, a dream I know we all share.

I suppose what made me upset more than anything is how autism is now the prop du jour of the entertainment world. That if they throw in an autistic kid or adult somehow it gives a hook into reality. In a more cynical world, I think the financial managers of the entertainment world may think that the autism hook will cause the autism community, which is growing exponentially every day, a reason to watch their show, improve their ratings and improve their take home pay. But then again that is just my thought about this explosion of autism characters in television and film.

I do like the show Eureka and I will continue to watch the show. It is fun. It is enjoyable. It is thought provoking in a scientific sense. It was an escape for me from the real world I inhabit.

I suppose it just comes down to the fact that I just wish the writers on Eureka had actually given some real thought to autism families, that live in the real world, before they mused about time lines, environments and genes, as if none of this means anything to anyone. It would have made a good episode a great episode and opened up an entire set of new possibilities. Of course they can still do that. Maybe the autism-scientist-mom will start a project to find out why her son is no longer autistic in the new time-line. It wouldn’t have to be a big story , just a little sideline of thought, but it would go along way in acknowledging that some answers are not found in science fiction.

Elise Ronan on FacebookElise Ronan on InstagramElise Ronan on Twitter
Elise Ronan
The purpose of this blog is to document the practical and realistic approach taken over the decades to help our two sons grow, and develop in order become all that they are entitled to become as human beings.
Elise Ronan

Elise Ronan

The purpose of this blog is to document the practical and realistic approach taken over the decades to help our two sons grow, and develop in order become all that they are entitled to become as human beings.

0 thoughts on ““Eureka” and Autism

  • July 20, 2010 at 3:51 pm
    Permalink

    @keystspf@xanga I didn’t know that about Bones (I don’t watch Big Bang), but they actually could address.  Adults are being diagnosed into their 40s and 50s, that would certainly shake up a thing or two!  I doubt they’d be courageous enough to go there.

    Reply
  • July 20, 2010 at 3:35 pm
    Permalink

    @ginabad – love your two-cents. You are also very right. We want our children to be accepted as they are, mostly because we don’t have a special pill or a time-portal machine that could change events and realities. This is our reality and we accept it,and strive for good things for our children.

    Reply
  • July 20, 2010 at 3:31 pm
    Permalink

    @keystspf@xanga – Actually the show the Big Bang Theory is written that Sheldon does have aspergers. It was on purpose as the writers son has aspergers. In fact when it was first starting the writers made a big deal about this fact. BTW we love Sheldon in our house. I think it is a shame that they never did address that Bones has aspergers syndrome. She is beautiful, brilliant and successful and a survivor of many terrible things in her life. it would have gone along way in dispelling alot of myths about people on the spectrum.

    You are correct in that a 42 mintue show could not do justice to the issue of the causes of autism. that said, I do not object to the discussion of the reasons, I object to how off handed it was and how glib. Henry could just have said, he did not know and that it was something they should look into. However, he said it in such a manner that there is no reason to pursue the issue further and I think does an injustice to the issue. its as if well if maybe we didn’t let our kids have that extra piece of cheese they would not have autism or if we got pregnant at 6pm instead of 4am then it would be different. I twasn’t what he said but how it was presented that irked me.

    Reply
  • July 20, 2010 at 11:12 am
    Permalink

    Did you know that the way the character of Temperance Brennan is portrayed on the show Bones is based on a friend of one of the producers who has Aspergers? They purposefully did not outright make Bones have AS because they didn’t want to go into all the ramifications of being associated with it… Instead they “blame” her off-beat personality on a troubled past. Now, eight seasons later, it is kind of a “thing” to have a character or two with AS or something like it. The Big Bang Theory is kinda funny. The handful of times I have watched the show, I’ve found myself saying Sheldon’s lines before he does. Grissom on CSI was compared to a suspect who had AS. They also did an episode where one of the suspects was autistic, he turned out to be innocent.

    Theories of what causes autism abound. Perhaps the show just picked the one that fit its genre the best. The combination of genetic and environmental factors IS one of the working theories out there. There is no way that they’re going to go into a detailed analysis of how that combination came about within the confines of a 42 minute show… especially when those details are NOT known right now. It is a theory. It is a real theory. One that is being tested and has been met with just enough results to warrant further investigation at this point, but not enough to go making widespread, detailed claims. From what you wrote, the show revealed about as much as is already known… anything else would be pure speculation. Which is worse?

    Reply
  • July 20, 2010 at 9:23 am
    Permalink

    Wow, I agree, almost verbatim, with your post!  I also like the show, and we had the same favorite scene.  I think you are right – there are more opportunities to explore the autism plotline, but I admit, I have gotten a sense lately that autism is “in fashion” in Hollywood and this bothers me so much. (One of my kids has autism, the other has Down syndrome, so I am keenly aware of attention – or lack of attention – given to disabilities in the realm of TV, film, and fiction.)

    Another possibility – and I don’t think they’ll go this route – is that the timeline could be reset back to where it was and then the mother would have to deal with going back and accepting her son all over again.  It’d be painful but I think it’d be a great plotline.  Isn’t that what we special needs parents truly want?  Not so much to change our children as to have the world a place where they can be accepted as they are.  Just my 2 cents…
    ginabad
    mom-blog.com

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.